We can say that viscosity is the resistance a material has to change in form. This property can be thought of as an Internal resistance to flow processes. The word "viscosity" derives from the Latin word "viscum" for mistletoe (A viscous glue was made from mistletoe berries and used to coat limetwigs to catch birds.)
To get a good feel for viscosity, we need to first digress and remember laminar flow. If a fluid or gas is flowing over a surface, the molecules next to the surface (the ones clinging to the walls) have zero speed. As we get farther away from the surface the speed increases. This difference in speed is a friction in the fluid or gas. It is the friction of molecules being pushed past each other. You can imagine that the amount of clingingness between the molecules will be proportional to the friction. This amount of clingingness is called viscosity. Thus, viscosity determines the amount of friction, which in turn determines the amount of energy absorbed by the flow.
Imagine a large room filled ankle deep with tar. On top of the tar is a large plate of steel that we want to slide across the surface. Now lets think of the cube of tar under the plate that is resisting this motion.
Friction is a force (in Newtons) acting against the direction of travel. This frictional force scales with the surface area in (in m^{2}). This friction is also inversely related to the thickness of the tar (in m). We all know that it is easier to stir molasses slowly so we know that the force goes up with the speed of stirring (in m/S). With Pl representing our constant of viscosity we derive it here:
Force = Pl x (Area of plate) x (speed) / (thickness)
Changing speed to Distance per second distance / time :
Force = Pl x (Area of plate) x (distance) / (thickness) x (time)
Rearranging to solve for the Poise value for tar:
Pl = Force x (thickness) x (time) / [(Area of plate) x (distance)]
or:
This is viscosity; a unit of power per unit of area, unit of speed and unit of speed gradient. ([#twist see this])
The Abbreviation Pl is the SI (mks) unit is called a Poiseuille. Unfortunately, no one uses it; instead they use the old cgs version of this formula expressed in dyneseconds per cm^{2} which is called a Poise (it is smaller, thus shorter (;). Actually, industry uses the centaPoise or onehundredth of a Poise because water has a viscosity of 1.002cP which is very close to 1.
So one Poiseuille = Ns/m^{2} = Pa*s = 10 aPoise = 1000 cP
, 
The names Poiseuille and the shortened Poise are from the great French physician, Jean Louis Poiseuille (1799  1869). I will digress at this point to try and help you pronounce this unit's name the best I can. Unfortunately, like many of the French, he had a name that is impossible to pronounce or spell. (The problem of pronouncing Poiseuille may well be the main cause of the United States failing to embrace the metric system<grin>) To start with poise is NOT pronounced as its homograph poise, meaning to walk in a balanced, dignified manner. Instead, imagine you are all puckered up, ready to kiss, just as your partner stomps painfully on your toe. The sound that comes out is "Poise". Phonetically it is spelled pwaz. (Hint: Be sure to practice in a place where you won't accidentally spit on someone.) With a little practice you will have mastered the more common of the units. Don't worry if you don't say it quite correctly; no one else can either or will ever even know the difference. Now for those up to a bit of a challenge; "Poiseuille". The first syllable is the same as Poise. All that is left is uille. A big help when pronouncing French words is to ignore the sounds of the all the letters. The syllable uille has no U, I, L, or E sound. Fill your mouth full with extra viscous peanut butter, plug your nose, and say sores. Phonetically it is spelled z Ə (r)z Probably because no one could pronounce his name, Poiseuille became a hard working student. Schooled in physics and mathematics Poiseuille developed an improved method for measuring blood pressure. Poiseuille’s interest in the forces that affected the blood flow in small blood vessels caused him to perform meticulous tests on the resistance of flow of liquids through capillary tubes. In 1846, he published a paper on his experimental research. Using compressed air, Poiseuille forced water (instead of blood due to the lack of anticoagulants) through capillary tubes. Because he controlled the applied pressure and the diameter of the tubes, Poiseuille’s measurement of the amount of fluid flowing showed there was a relationship. He discovered that the rate of flow through a tube increases proportionately to the pressure applied and to the fourth power of the tube diameter. Failing to find the constant of proportionality, that work was left to two other scientists, who later found it to be , . In honor of his early work the equation for flow of liquids through a tube is called Poiseuille's Law. (This story is somewhat misleading because blood flow pulsates and the viscosity of blood declines in capillaries as the cells line up single file. Thus, even with this information we have to wait for the discovery of anticoagulants  (by a long hair, Karl Paul Link, at University of Wisconsin  vitamin K) to do definitive experiments.) 
While the viscosity of solids and liquids falls with increasing temperature (inverse relationship), the viscosity of a gas increases. While it seems counter intuitive, the rise in gas viscosity as a function temperature can be understood. As a gas gets higher in temperature it has more collisions, and thus, more friction with its neighboring molecules.
Another surprise is that pressure has very little effect on the viscosity of water. Waters virtual independence from pressure means that water flowing in a pipe has an insignificant change in friction whether at 60 psi or 20,000 psi!
Water is uniquely self compressed by hydrogen bonding. At a
molecular weight of 18, it is lighter than air and otherwise would be
concentrated at the outer limits of the atmosphere. To understand this
compare water to the isoelectronic, and heavier, gas H2S.
Instead, water is a liquid because its tetrahedral arrangement of
two protons (positive charges) and two electron pairs (negative
charges) makes the molecule polar which causes collections of water
molecules to spontaneously arrange themselves into assemblies held
together by electrical charges. This hydrogen bonding force or 'Van der
Waals' force is somewhat greater than several thousand psi we might
apply.
Oils, and almost everything else, are not so
selfcompressed. Paraffinic oils, in particular, are held together by
much weaker induced dipole charges. Thus there is much space between the
molecules that allow them to pass easily by each other. This space can
be reduced by applying pressure, increasing density and viscosity.
This difference is of critical importance to the business of drilling
for oil. When an 8" hole, 4 miles deep is filled with water, the
viscosity is essentially the same from top to bottom. When filled with
oil, viscosity and density varies from top to bottom, making it much
more difficult to predict friction pressures of flows.
So water and gas's viscosity are mostly independent to pressure. With Gases until the pressure is less than 3% of normal air pressure the change is negligible on falling bodies.
The Poiseuille and the Poise are units of dynamic viscosity sometimes called absolute viscosity.
1 Poiseuille (Pl) = 10 poise (P) = 1000 cP
P = 0.1Pl
1 centiPoise (cP) = .01 poise
Some examples of Viscosity  these may help you get a feel for the cP Send in number if you have them  

Hydrogen @20°C  0.008 6 cP  Benzyl ether @ 20°C  5.33 cP  Honey  3,000cP 
Ammonia @ 20°C  0.009 82 cP  Glycol @ 20°C( probably ethylene glycol)  19.9 cP  Honey @ 20°C  10,000 cP 
Silane SiH4 1.013 bar and 0 °C 
0.0108cP  
Water vapor @100°C  0.012 55  Linseedoil (Raw)  28cP  Honey  2,0003,000cP 
CO2 gas @ 0°C  0.015cP  



Air @ 18°C  0.018 2 cP  Linseedoil (Boiled)  64cP  

Argon @ 20°C  0.022 17 cP  Soya bean oil @ 20°C  69.3 cP  

Air @ 229°C  0.026 38 cP  Corn oil  72cP  

Neon @ 20°C  0.031 11 cP  Olive oil @ 20°C  84.0 cP  Blackstrap Molasses  5,000  10,000cP 
Water@20C  1 cP  
CO2 Liquid @ 18°C  0.14cP  

Molasses @25°C  8,700cP 
Liquid air @ 192.3°C  0.173 cP  Light machine oil @ 20°C  102 cP  
molten Glass  10,000cP  
Ether @ 20°C  0.233 cP  Motor oil SAE 10  50100cP 65cP  Chocolate syrup @ 20°C  25,000 cP 
Water @ 99°C  0.2848 cP  Motor oil SAE 20  125cP  Hershey’s Chocolate Syrup  10,00025000cP 


Motor oil SAE 30  150200cP 200cP  Ketchup @ 20°C  50,000 cP 
Motor oil SAE 30??  100cP  
Acetone  0.3cP  Motor oil SAE 40  250500cP 319cP  Ketchup Heinz  50,000  70,000cP 
70% Sucrose in water  480cP  
Benzene  0.50cP  Motor oil SAE 50  540cP  Ketchup @25°C  98,000cP 


Heavy machine oil @ 20°C  233 cP  Peanut butter  150,000250,000cP 250,000cP 


Caster oil @ 20°C  986 cP  Corn Syrup  110,000cP ?? 


Motor oil SAE 60  1,000  2000cP 1,000cP  Peanut butter @ 20°C  250,000 cP 
Soft end of glass working range  1.0x10^{6}cP  
Chloroform@ 20°C  0.58 cP  Glycerin @ 20°C  1,410cP 1,490 cP 
Smooth Peanut butter @ 25°C  1.2x10^{6}cP 
Methyl alcohol@ 20°C  0.597 cP  Motor oil SAE 70  1,600cP  Bitumen Canada’s Athabasca reservoir sands are about 1012% bitumen, at 11 deg. C  1 x 10^{6 }cP 
Benzene @ 20°C  0.652 cP  Pancake syrup @ 20°C  2,500 cP  Crisco Shortening  1x10^{6}2x10^{6}cP 1.2x10^{6}cP 
Glass Softening Point (sags of own weight)  3.9x10^{6}cP  
Water @ 20°C  1.002 cP  maple syrup @25°C  3,200 cP  Window putty  1x10^{8}cP 
Ethyl alcohol @ 20°C  1.2 cP  Venezuela’s Orinoco extra heavy oil reservoirs are about 53 deg. C with viscosity of  1,5003,000 cp  Firm end of glass working range  1x10^{10}cP 
Tar or pitch @ 20°C 
3x10^{10}cP  
Mercury @ 20°C  1.554 cP  1x10^{10}cP  
Soda Glass @ 575°C  1x10^{15} cP 
Glass Annealing point  1x10^{15} cP  
Glass Strain Point (low end of annealing process)  3.1x10^{16} cP  




Earth upper mantle 
3 to 10*10^{23} cP 




Earth lower mantle 
2 to 3x10^{25} cP 
If there are two numbers listed above it refers to two difference sources of the information. None of the source measurements had any error number associated with them.
Nice thing about standards is ... there are so many to chose from ..
SSU or Seconds Saybolt Universal. It is the amount of time
in seconds required for 60 milliliters of liquid to flow through a
calibrated orifice under controlled conditions as per ASTM D 88. This
method has largely been supplanted by the kinematic viscosity method.
[thankfully]
To obtain the Saybolt Universal Viscosity
equivalent to a kinematic viscosity determined at t, multiply the
equivalent Saybolt Universal Viscosity at 100°F by 1 + (t  100)
0.000064.
Example: 10v at 210°F are equivalent to 58.91 multiplied by 1.0070 or 59.32 sec Saybolt Universal at 210°F.
Degree MacMichael (°McM) a unit used to measure the viscosity, or thickness, of chocolate. Typical values range from around 60 °McM (very thin chocolates suitable for pouring into molds) to around 190 °McM (very thick chocolates suitable for hand dipping or forming around a center). A MacMichael viscometer is used to make the measurement.
Two different conversions to MacMichael 
Brookfield ???
Please update with any conversions between Brookfield and centaPoise or Machmichael and centaPoise
The Poise is not related to density. To come up with a unit incorporating density we look at the Poiseuille divided by density. Remember that a Poiseuille is a Newtonsecond per square meter or ns/m^{2.} Remembering that a Newton is a Kilogram  meter per second squared or kg m/s^{2}
we can re write the Poise unit as kg m s/m^{2}s^{2 }which simplifies to kg/ms. Corresponding units for density would be the Kilogram per cubic meter or kg/m^{3} so dividing a Poise Unit by density gives us
kg m^{3}/kg m s which simplifies to m^{2}/s. The common kinematic viscosity unit is the Stokes, abbreviated St. Instead of being in SI units, the stoke is in cgm units of cm^{2}/s and one tenthousandths the size.
,  George Stokes' law of viscosity established the science of
hydrodynamics. We most often run into him with the work he did on the
settling of spheres, but he also derived various flow relationships
ranging from wave mechanics to viscous resistance.
Stokes papers on the motion of incompressible fluids, the friction of fluids in motion, and the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids exemplifies his wide range of influence in physics. His works on the transmission of acoustic waves through viscous materials (like tar) are also of interest. Stokes also investigated the wave theory of light, named and explained the phenomenon of fluorescence, and theorized an explanation of Fraunhofer lines in the solar spectrum. He suggested these were caused by atoms in the outer layers of the Sun absorbing certain wavelengths. However when Kirchhoff later published this explanation Stokes disclaimed any prior discovery. In short Stokes was an allaround whiz kid (whose name we can pronounce). (If you know of any good stories about George email them here). Stokes came up with a formula that can predict the rate at which a sphere falls through a viscous gas or liquid. He was the first to understand why a mouse can fall 1000 feet and walk away yet a man would be dead. 
This velocity is the terminal or ultimate velocity the sphere will attain falling through the liquid or gas in question. Thus approximating a mouse and man’s body as a sphere, and assuming that we have a radius 5 times that of a mouse – the terminal velocity of a man (about 100 mi/hr) would be 25 times that of a mouse! This form of the equation can be solved for Poise and the experiment timed (to determine terminal velocity) so that we have a handy way to measure viscosity.
Dropping a sphere of known size and mass in a liquid and measuring its terminal speed is one way to measure viscosity. This method gives an enormous range of measurements; the largest to smallest readings give us a ratio of about a billion to one. Noting the temperature is most important when taking such a measurement because of the great change even a small change in temperature can cause. Caster oil can change its viscosity about 8% per degree c!
The equations covered so far work as long as the motion is slow enough to keep the flows in the laminar domain. Once the speeds increase past a limit the drags grow at enormous rates. Sometimes it is necessary to figure out if the dominant variable is the viscous flow or inertial flow.
,  There is no way to do justice in describing Reynolds work; that would require a book. He was not just a scientist, but also the prototype of the modern engineer. In his work can be seen the rigorous error checking that set the standards for later workers. Although Reynolds is best known for his number, few fields of science and engineering are not touched with his life’s work. From discharge tubes, to bearings, to thermodynamics, to cavitation, to magnetism, and electricity; he left his mark. (Yet, this is but a part of what he did!) This Irish Brit  Osborne Reynolds  came up with a unit that like the Mach number is dimensionless. When the Reynolds number (abbreviated Re) is properly calculated all units cancel out. 
(all units cancel out),
Small Reynolds numbers mean that the fluid's viscosity is dominant. On the other hand when Re is larger than 10,000 it means that viscosity is negligible and the kinetic or inertial effects rule.
When Re is high, turbulence, cavitations, and chaos describe the flow. When Re is low, laminar flow dominates and drag is approximately equal to speed X size X dynamic viscosity giving a linear rise in drag with speed (and a squaring of power with speed).
On the other hand, when Re is large drag is approximately equal to Speed^{2} X Size^{2} X density! This means that once the Reynolds number is large, drag goes up with the square of speed and power goes up with the cube of the speed!
A kind reader noticed (from an older version of this page) my failed attempt at explain viscosity (I tried to make the equation to mean a unit of power per unit of area  something it is not). My goal was to put viscosity in to an intuitive concept using an energetic approach to grasping the units. My Idea was that viscosity could be seen as the ability to absorb power.
The classic definition for viscosity which you have put in the current version of your page is:
Viscosity = [Frictional Force x thickness x time] / [(Area of plate) x (distance)] I would like to group this expression in a slight different manner, to show the physical meaning of viscosity:
Viscosity = [Frictional Force/Area of plate] / [(distance/time)/(thickness)]
The last part of the expression is the concept “speed variation for thickness unit” (actually the speed gradient in a direction perpendicular to flow). So, the dynamic meaning of viscosity would be:
Viscosity is the force needed to apply on a plate of unit surface in direction of travel to move it to achieve a unitary speed variation for each unit thickness.
Or the same using differential analysis elements:
Viscosity is the force needed to apply on a plate of unit surface in direction to travel to move it to achieve a unit of speed gradient.
Now let as go to an energetic approach to viscosity.
Power (P) is force times speed.
Power = Force x speed
But frictional force is, according to dynamic formula:
Frictional force = [Viscosity x Area of plate] x [(distance/time)/(thickness)]
so, power is:
Power = speed [Viscosity x Area of plate] x [(distance/time)/(thickness)]
and the energetic expression of viscosity is now:
Viscosity = Power / {Area of plate x speed x [(distance/time)/(thickness)]}
Being the viscosity definition:
Viscosity is the power needed to apply on a plate of unit area to sustain a unit speed keeping a unitary variation of speed for each unit thickness.
Or using differential analysis expressions:
Viscosity is the power needed to apply on a plate of unit area to sustain a unit speed with a unit speed gradient.
So, using dimensional analysis:
“This is viscosity; a unit of power per unit of area, unit of speed and unit of speed gradient” Hugo J. Gavarini
Reynolds number! I haven’t heard much about that since I was at the wind tunnel. Simulating the proper Reynolds number in a wind tunnel has always been a problem with scale models. One approach is a pressure tunnel. By increasing the pressure in the tunnel to increase the density or use a gas other than air that is more dense. As the tunnel runs it tends to heat up which works against you by lowering the density. The Vertol tunnel had an air exchange system to keep the tunnel cool. To simulate a higher Reynolds number we tripped the boundary layer at the appropriate point on the wing to transition to a turbulent boundary layer. This was done with a narrow band of grit glued to the wing surfaces. We also used small vortex generators glued to the wing to put the appropriate amount of energy into the now turbulent boundary layer. KFS Wichita
In the book "Theory and Practice of Lubrication for Engineers" by Dudley D. Fuller, he states that pressure has a significant effect on viscosity for lubricating oils. For example he shows that it may change by a factor of 2 when the pressure changes from atmospheric to 3000 psi. Is Fuller correct?
D Lund
Hello, Hey, you really have a great web page on viscosity! One of the challenges I have as an oil well drilling engineer is trying to explain viscosity and its effects on the friction pressure. When you have long wellbores, and you try to pump fluids in (or out), the friction pressures can be in 100’s or 1000’s of psi. If the friction pressure gets too high, subsurface formations may break down, and the fluid may go where you don’t want it to. Lisa Denke Diatomite Drilling Engineer

very nice explanations!... the Re number for expelled lung mucus is about 100...so is this a high number bordering on Newtonian Physics or a low number in nonnewton territory given that beating cilia (seried ranks of 200 of them over 25 square microns) act on the mucus at 10 Hz anil mehta
If you found this information useful  we ask that you consider linking to a product page .
(C) Copyright 19942017, Transtronics, Inc. All rights reserved
Transtronics® is a registered trademark of Transtronics, Inc.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.